tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3462917576999373160.post6498438611513198280..comments2023-10-15T05:27:29.590-04:00Comments on <center>Imprisoned Whimsy</center>: Mid-Century MondayKarmanderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03680982083073868052noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3462917576999373160.post-60161405475514069802008-04-22T10:28:00.000-04:002008-04-22T10:28:00.000-04:00It seems to me this dress was designed to look bac...It seems to me this dress was designed to look backwards. Which makes sense, because in the 50's women wore their sweaters backwards...kids were always rebellious fashion victims, I guess lol.Karmanderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03680982083073868052noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3462917576999373160.post-64819029996335029492008-04-21T22:51:00.000-04:002008-04-21T22:51:00.000-04:00It's the front. The hand on the right would be in ...It's the front. The hand on the right would be in a very, very uncomfortable position if it were on the back like that. Also, the neck part seems to slant forward. And finally, I looked at the original site it came from :P On there, you can see various views of the mannequin. It shows a view of the other side of the dress, which has almost a sweetheart neckline (and a zipper), and the descriptionAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3462917576999373160.post-58290009752954110062008-04-21T13:23:00.000-04:002008-04-21T13:23:00.000-04:00Wow, this is really interesting!!!! You cannot fig...Wow, this is really interesting!!!! You cannot figure it out is is front or back??? Hmm...the hand with flowers looks like it's from the back...but the other one looks like its in the front!! i don't know what I'm saying anymore!! All in all, great set! :-DDDXhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05475622299674101906noreply@blogger.com